Close Menu

Kaiser Malpractice Arbitration

Kaiser Permanente health plan members are subject to a requirement to arbitrate their cases, rather than sue in court. Some Kaiser health plan members are able to opt out of this arbitration requirement, due to defective member agreements which Kaiser Permanente used in the past. Depending on the jurisdiction, the odds of winning may be significantly higher in an arbitration than they would be with a jury, so long as the Kaiser Permanente case arbitrator is carefully selected. The flip side of this equation is the perception that private arbitrators tend to give lower awards in cases where they find for the person suing, due to their less emotional approach to the decision, and their hopes for future work from Kaiser Permanente. Kaiser cases were always heard by a three–arbitrator panel in the past, but the great majority of claimants have opted for a single arbitrator since the rules were changed to permit it. Despite going to arbitration rather than jury trials, Kaiser cases have virtually the same pre–trial procedural rules that apply to court cases.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in this form. This form sends information by non-encrypted e-mail which is not secure. By submitting this form, I understand that it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms